The call for papers for the interdisciplinary conference on AGEING: HISTORIES, MYTHOLOGIES, TABOOS at the University of Bergen in January 2015 closes on 1st September. To see the details, click below
You are currently browsing the monthly archive for August 2014.
The Poetics of Knowledge
University of Bern, 5-7 November 2015
One very common narrative about Victorian Britain is that it was an age of ground-breaking scientific discoveries: Charles Lyell significantly extended the age of our planet; Charles Darwin forced a rethinking of the origins and development of life; Michael Faraday and James Maxwell Clark paved the way for modern physics; Non-Euclidean Geometry changed the way mathematicians measured and formalized the world; Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace laid the foundation for computing. The list could be expanded at leisure, as scientists made and remade the various fields in which humans have tried to make sense of the natural world. Both the individual discoveries and the underlying myth of scientific progress they allegedly add up to have repeatedly been analysed in narratological terms; Misia Landau (1984), and more recently David Amigoni and James Elwick (2011) have identified the narrative premises common to most scientific accounts of the past. Historians of science, Landau argues, are keen to speak about discoveries and innovations in the form of a meaningful sequence of origin, development and purpose, a structure of beginning, middle and end reminiscent of conventional narratological definitions of the plot in a work of fiction. Others, like Gillian Beer in her seminal study Darwin’s Plots (2009), have pointed to the way in which scientists themselves clothe their discoveries in narrative garments and how the plots they develop are both influenced by narrative tradition and in turn find their way back into literary narratives.
With this conference we would like to explore an alternative perspective. Instead of concentrating on the narrative character of scientific discourse, we want to explore its poetic side. Our aim thereby is twofold. First, we want to look into the historical and philosophical reasons for the predisposition against non-narrative forms of scientific literature and investigate poetic structures and elements in earlier scientific as well as literary texts that run counter to this alleged predominance of narrative. Based on this, we want to explore nineteenth-century literary works which use scientific ideas and language in non-narrative, and in particular poetic, forms. Relevant questions in this context include, among others, whether there is a fundamental categorical difference between narrative and poetic explorations of science in literature, how the noticeable bias for the former reflects social, political, cultural and economic conditions of the time, and whether gender becomes a relevant factor in the choice of poetic or narrative form.
To explore these and other related questions, we invite contributions which address the following topics:
- Literary Theory and Science: Narrative and poetic structures in scientific discourse and accounts of scientific discovery. A theoretical and analytical framework for the analysis of poetic texts dealing with scientific issues.
- Poetic Knowledge vs. Narrative Knowledge: Epistemological implications of poetic and narrative frameworks of knowledge, cognitive preconditions and consequences.
- Scientific Domains and Poetic Voices: Exemplary analyses of non-narrative works of literature engaging with the scientific discourse of the time.
- A Muted Tradition?: Examples of poetic texts addressing scientific issues prior to the nineteenth century.
- The Two Cultures: Accounts of the rivalling discourses of Science and the Humanities in the nineteenth century. Debates about their role in education and their respective cultural relevance.
- Gendered Forms?: The role of gender in establishing different forms of scientific discourse and literary engagements with science.
Abstracts (300-500 words) of 20-minute papers should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com by 1 March 2015. Please include your name, academic title, affiliation, e-mail address as well as a short biographical note (100 words, approx.). We welcome contributions by junior researchers. Finished papers will have to be submitted by 30 August 2015. Every presenter will be asked to provide a brief response (5-7 min) to one paper. There will be the possibility to organise child care if needed. Please get in touch with the organisers for more information if you would like to take advantage of this service.
Being Modern: Science and Culture in the early 20th century
Institute of Historical Research, London 22-24 April 2015
Engagement with science was commonly used as an emblem of “Being modern”, across culture in Britain and the western world in the years around the First World War. Today, historical studies of literature, art, design, lifestyle and consumption as well as of the human sciences are exploring intensively, but frequently separately, on that talk of “science”.
Historians of science are exploring the interpenetration of discourse in the public sphere and expert communities. This pioneering interdisciplinary conference is therefore planned to bring together people who do not normally meet in the same space. Scholars from a range of disciplines will come together to explore how the complex interpretations of science affected the re-creation of what it was to be modern.
Please see the website for more details: http://www.qmul.ac.uk/being-modern/
Submissions for four types of presentation and discussion are sought:
- disciplinary panels of three x15 minute papers and discussion
- cross-disciplinary panels of three x15 minute papers and discussion
- Focus on research presentations of 5 minutes plus two minute discussion each will provide opportunities particularly for graduate students
- Poster sessions
Closing date 19 October 2014. Get in early – competition will be strong!
Submissions to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Enquiries to: Robert.email@example.com
Dr Robert Bud
Keeper of Science and Medicine
The Science Museum, London
Biennial London Chaucer Conference: Science, Magic and Technology
10-12 July 2015
Institute of English Studies, Senate House, London
Call for Papers
Papers are sought on all aspects of ‘Science, Magic and Technology’ in late medieval literature and culture and particularly within Chaucer studies. Approaches might include:
The presentation of scientific ideas in myth and poetry
Observation and naturalism in literature and art
Experiment and experience in science and literature
The occult sciences (astrology, magic, alchemy) and their relationship to literature
Technology as magic, magic as a technology
Scientific literatures and the literariness of science
Epistemology and taxonomy in late medieval writing
Technologies of writing, parchment making and codicology
Concepts of the material and immaterial worlds, the environment, astrology, astronomy and cosmology
Cartography; deep-sea and space exploration
The science of the senses, optics, sound or scent
The representation of medicine in literature or the literary modes of medical writing
Trade technologies in literature
Science, magic and technology in medievalism
Papers are welcomed on the work of Geoffrey Chaucer or, more broadly, on late medieval writing and culture.
Please send 250 word abstracts to Dr Isabel Davis; Birkbeck, University of London. firstname.lastname@example.org by 1st September 2014.
University of Liverpool
Deadline: September 1, 2014
Oliver Lodge was a defender of pure science, particularly in the modern university, yet he took a keen interest in how science might be applied throughout his career, taking out patents and setting up businesses. This workshop, which will take place in the University of Liverpool’s Victoria Building, the opening of which Lodge attended in 1892, examines the distinction between pure and applied science in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Speakers already confirmed include Di Drummond (Leeds Trinity), Bruce Hunt (University of Texas), Peter Rowlands (Liverpool), and Matthew Stanley (New York University).
The committee invites proposals for short papers (20 minutes) for a panel session at this one-day workshop. Please send proposals (no more than 300 words) to email@example.com by September 1, 2014.
Topics for discussion might include:
Physics in the late nineteenth / early twentieth century
The distinction between pure and applied science in the period
Oliver Lodge as a scientist and / or engineer
Intellectual property and science
The place of science in the late nineteenth / early twentieth-century university
The contested state of the ether in the science of the period
The place of experiment / theory
Scientific equipment and the role of the laboratory
Lodge and Liverpool; Liverpool and science
Science teaching in the late nineteenth / early twentieth century
Science and spiritualism
This is the third in a series of workshops dedicated to Oliver Lodge organized by Making Waves: Oliver Lodge and the Cultures of Science, 1875-1940. This AHRC-funded research network, led by James Mussell and Graeme Gooday, seeks to consider the life and legacy of Oliver Lodge as a way of understanding the place of science in culture, both in his period and our own. See oliverlodge.org for further details.